- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-9/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission (Staff case — Open competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 in the field of fraud prevention — Act adversely affecting the applicants — Exclusion of candidates following results obtained in admission tests — EPSO not competent)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009FA0009
62009FA0009
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.1.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 13/37
(Case F-9/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Staff case - Open competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 in the field of fraud prevention - Act adversely affecting the applicants - Exclusion of candidates following results obtained in admission tests - EPSO not competent)
2011/C 13/71
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Vicente Carbajosa and Others (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision adopting and publishing the competition notices EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 and the decisions relating to the correction of the pre-selection tests and the written tests and the awarding of marks for the oral tests.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decisions of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to admit Ms Vicente Carbajosa in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/117/08 and Ms Lehtinen and Ms Menchén in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/116/08 onto the list of candidates invited to submit a full application;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the action as being inadmissible;
3.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 82 of 04.04.2009, p. 37.