I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 279/75)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Isola and G. Isola, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank
The annulment, first, of the decision not to reimburse the expenses incurred by the applicant for laser treatment undergone in 2007 and, secondly, of the consecutive and connected decisions taken by the bank in 2014.
The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:
—annul the decision notified on 4 December 2014 and all measures connected, consecutive or prior to it, which certainly include the letters of the EIB of 8 January 2014, 31 January 2014, 14 February 2014, 24 February 2014, 30 April 2014 and 3 July 2014, and the opinion of 26 February 2008 of Dr M., the bank’s medical officer and the report he issued in October 2008 and, lastly, the opinion issued by Dr S. on 6 October 2014;
—order the EIB to reimburse the sum of EUR 3 000, corresponding to the sum spent by the applicant to undergo laser treatment performed on 29 and 31 October 2007 and 21 and 23 November 2007, and to pay compensation assessed on equitable grounds for the material and non-material harm incurred, together with interest and an amount to offset inflation on the sums granted;
—in the alternative, order the European Union to pay EUR 3 000 by way of compensation for the damage incurred by the applicant because of its ambiguous provisions, together with interest and an amount to offset inflation;
—order the EIB and the European Union to pay, on the basis of joint and several liability, compensation assessed on equitable grounds in respect of the non-material harm incurred and to pay the costs of the proceedings.