- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-89/14: Action brought on 10 February 2014 — Export Development Bank of Iran v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0089
62014TN0089
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.5.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 135/49
(Case T-89/14)
2014/C 135/63
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Export Development Bank of Iran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: J.-M. Thouvenin, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1154/2013 of 15 November 2013 in so far as it concerns the applicant;
—annul Council Decision 2013/661/CFSP of 15 November 2013 in so far as it concerns the applicant;
—declare Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 inapplicable to the applicant;
—declare decision 2010/413 CFSP inapplicable to the applicant;
—in the alternative, annul the implementing regulation and the decision mentioned in the first two indents of the present form of order, as from 20 January 2014;
—order the Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of its action, the applicant relies on nine pleas in law of which eight are essentially identical or similar to those advanced in Case T-65/14 Bank Refah Kargaran v Council.
Furthermore the applicant relies on a plea in law alleging infringement of the principles of equality and of non-discrimination.