I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 279/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: J. Sroka, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Universal for Engineering Industries SAE (Giza, Egypt)
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Universal 1800 TC’ — Application for registration No 10 632 503
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 April 2015 in Case R 1303/2014-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.