- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-65/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 February 2014 — Armani v Commission (Civil Service — Remuneration Annulment of the decision of the Commission not to grant the applicant family allowance in respect of his wife’s son of a previous marriage — Family allowances — Entitlement to the dependent child allowance — Dependent child — Child of the applicant’s wife)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012FA0065
62012FA0065
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.3.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 85/25
(Case F-65/12)(1)
(Civil Service - Remuneration Annulment of the decision of the Commission not to grant the applicant family allowance in respect of his wife’s son of a previous marriage - Family allowances - Entitlement to the dependent child allowance - Dependent child - Child of the applicant’s wife)
2014/C 85/41
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Enrico Maria Armani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and V. Joris, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for the annulment of the decision of the Commission not to grant the applicant family allowance in respect of his wife’s son of a previous marriage.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of 17 August 2011, by which the European Commission refused to recognise Mr Armani’s entitlement to a dependent child allowance in respect of his wife’s child;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the action;
3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Armani.
(1) OJ C 243, 11.8.2012, p. 34.
Language of the case: French