EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-294/24, Zadzhova: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Burgas (Bulgaria) lodged on 24 April 2024 – Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia EAD v ED

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0294

62024CN0294

April 24, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/4713

5.8.2024

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Burgas (Bulgaria) lodged on 24 April 2024 – ‘Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia’ EAD v ED

(Case C-294/24, Zadzhova)

(C/2024/4713)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ‘Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia’ EAD

Defendant: ED

Question referred

Must Article 3(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (2) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts be interpreted as meaning that a term such as that laid down in Article 3[1](2) of the standard business terms of the Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia Burgas (Burgas Water Supply and Sewerage Utility, ‘the Burgas Water Utility’) causes a significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the contractual parties as provided for in the standard business terms, to the detriment of the consumer, given that the recoverability of a debt under those provisions of the standard business terms, and the start of the limitation period applicable to a debt for services supplied to consumers by the Burgas Water Utility, is exclusively dependent on the conduct of the water utility in relation to the issuing of an invoice, even if the utility does not comply with its obligation to issue monthly invoices?

The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4713/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia