- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-686/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 18 September 2019 — ‘Soho Group’ SIA v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0686
62019CN0686
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.11.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/32
(Case C-686/19)
(2019/C 399/37)
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: ‘Soho Group’ SIA
Defendant: Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
Questions referred
1.Is the concept ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’, defined in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, an autonomous concept of EU law?
2.Are the costs of extending the credit included in the concept ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’, defined in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, in circumstances such as those of the present case, if the clauses on extending the credit form part of the terms and conditions of the credit agreement agreed by the borrower and the lender?
(1) OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.
* * *
Language of the case: Latvian