EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-354/24: Action brought on 15 July 2024 – Mowi Poland v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0354

62024TN0354

July 15, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5119

26.8.2024

(Case T-354/24)

(C/2024/5119)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Mowi Poland S.A. (Ustka, Poland) (represented by: Z. Kiedacz and K. Puchalska, radcy prawni)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul in its entirety Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1141 of 14 December 2023 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards specific hygiene requirements for certain meat, fishery products, dairy products and eggs; (1)

in the alternative: annul in part Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1141, namely point 3(e) of the annex to that regulation, in the event that the Court considers that that provision does not affect the substance of the act in its entirety;

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 290 TFEU. The infringement consists in the fact that the contested act concerns essential elements reserved for the legislative act.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 5(4) TEU. The infringement consists in the fact that the contested act is contrary to the principle of proportionality. That incompatibility is characterised by a lack of appropriateness, necessity and proportionality.

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2) The infringement consists in the fact that the contested act does not serve to fulfil the aims of Regulation No 853/2004, that is to say food safety and the proper functioning of the internal market.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004. The infringement concerns the failure to consult the European Food Safety Authority when working on the delegated regulation, even though – according to the applicant – such consultation was obligatory in that case.

(1) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1141 of 14 December 2023 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards specific hygiene requirements for certain meat, fishery products, dairy products and eggs (OJ L 2024/1141).

(2) Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin (OJ 2004 L 139, p. 55).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5119/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia