EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-87/22: Action brought on 17 February 2022 — Hahn Rechtsanwälte v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0087

62022TN0087

February 17, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/38

(Case T-87/22)

(2022/C 165/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hahn Rechtsanwälte PartG mbB (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: K. Künstner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the European Commission’s decision C(2021) 9326 final of 7 December 2021;

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging no grounds for refusal under Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (1)

The Commission failed to set out any commercial reasons worthy of protection with regard to the parties to cartel proceedings AT.40178 — Car Emissions, within the meaning of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and failed to carry out a case-by-case examination.

The Commission cannot rely on the protection of investigations, in view of the fact that this case concerns a closed cartel investigation with a decision that has become final and the Commission also failed to carry out a case-by-case examination.

The Commission relies on the general presumption of non-disclosure, despite the fact that the conditions provided for in the first and/or third indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 are not met which leads to an inadmissible distortion of the ‘rule-exception relationship’ of the right of access.

2.Second plea in law, alleging overriding public interest in disclosure within the meaning of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001

The Commission erred in not finding that there was an overriding public interest within the meaning of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.

In the present case, a failure to have regard for interests of public welfare is evident, since the arrangements contrary to cartel law also concern the defeat devices of passenger cars and excessive nitrogen oxide emissions have a negative impact on interests of public welfare such as health, the environment and climate.

According to the findings of the European Environment Agency (EEA), approximately 12 800 people die each year in Germany alone from air pollution caused by nitrogen oxide.

3.Third plea in law, alleging lack of a specific examination of partial access pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001

The Commission did not examine in a sufficiently specific manner whether, in the alternative, partial access to the files should be granted pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.

No examination as to whether it might be possible to adopt a less restrictive measure concerning the applicant’s right of access took place.

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia