I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-263/17)(1)
((Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contracts - Decision not to renew - Request for renewal having the same purpose as a complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - Inadmissibility))
(2018/C 152/46)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: SD (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Institute for Gender Equality (represented by: V. Langbakk, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Action under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the implied decision of EIGE dated 26 August 2016 rejecting the Applicant’s request dated 26 April 2016 for a second renewal of his contract of employment and, where necessary, annulment of the decision of EIGE of 20 January 2017 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 3 October 2016 against the implied decision of 26 August 2016 and, secondly, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of those decisions.
1.The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.
2.SD is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE).
(1)
OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.