I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-459/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark BIOLARK - Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 223/37)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee and A. Ringelhann, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Biolark, Inc. (San Diego, California, United States)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 April 2022 (Case R 1234/2021-5).
The Court:
1.Refuses the application for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate made by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);
2.Dismisses the action;
3.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 340, 5.9.2022.
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140
* * *
(*) Language of the case: English.