- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-758/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 November 2023 — Ryanair DAC, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Measures implemented by the Republic of Austria for Klagenfurt Airport, Ryanair and other airlines using that airport — Decision declaring the aid measures to be incompatible in part with the internal market — Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union — Evidence submitted to the General Court after the written part of the procedure has been closed — Admissibility — Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Article 17(1) and (2) — Powers of the European Commission to recover aid — Limitation period — Degree of precision with respect to actions that interrupt that period — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Data relevant for determining the amount of aid to recover)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0758
62021CA0758
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/604
(Case C-758/21 P) (*)
(Appeal - State aid - Measures implemented by the Republic of Austria for Klagenfurt Airport, Ryanair and other airlines using that airport - Decision declaring the aid measures to be incompatible in part with the internal market - Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union - Evidence submitted to the General Court after the written part of the procedure has been closed - Admissibility - Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Article 17(1) and (2) - Powers of the European Commission to recover aid - Limitation period - Degree of precision with respect to actions that interrupt that period - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence - Data relevant for determining the amount of aid to recover)
(C/2024/604)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: Ryanair DAC, Airport Marketing Services Ltd (represented by: B. Byrne, Solicitor, S. Rating, abogado, and E. Vahida, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck, A. Bouchagiar and J. Ringborg, and subsequently by A. Bouchagiar and J. Ringborg, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd to pay the costs.
(*)
OJ C 51, 31.1.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/604/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/604/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
Language of the case: English.