- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-413/17: Action brought on 29 June 2017 — Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0413
62017TN0413
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.8.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 277/52
(Case T-413/17)
(2017/C 277/75)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG (Tuttlingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Gruber, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word elements ‘3D’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1 272 627
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 April 2017 in Case R 1502/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 11 April 2017 in Case R 1502/2016-2 and register the trade mark ‘3D’, IR 1 272 627, designating the European Union for all the goods applied for including the goods which are still affected by the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of the Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of the Regulation No 207/2009.