EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Cruz Vilaça delivered on 25 May 1988. # Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. # Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to transpose into national law Commission Directive 84/414/EEC - Adaptation to technical progress of Directive 76/764/EEC. # Case 326/87.

ECLI:EU:C:1988:261

61987CC0326

May 25, 1988
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61987C0326

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Vilaça delivered on 25 May 1988. - Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. - Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to transpose into national law Commission Directive 84/414/EEC - Adaptation to technical progress of Directive 76/764/EEC. - Case 326/87.

European Court reports 1988 Page 04009

Opinion of the Advocate-General

Mr President, Members of the Court,

1 . Commission Directive 84/414/EEC ( 1 )of 18 July 1984 amended, by adapting it to technical progress, Directive 76/764/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to clinical mercury-in-glass maximum-reading thermometers,(2 )as amended by Council Directive 83/128/EEC of 28 March 1983.(3 )

2 . Article 2 of the new directive provided that the Member States were to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with it by 1 January 1986 and inform the Commission thereof forthwith .

3 . Having received no information from the Italian Republic, on 9 July 1986 the Commission initiated the procedure under Article 169 of the Treaty .

4 . The Italian authorities made no reply during the administrative phase, and the Commission therefore brought the present action before the Court for a declaration that by failing to give notice of the measures which it was under a duty to adopt by virtue of that directive, or by failing to adopt such measures, the Italian Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty .

6 . At the hearing the Commission confirmed that, needless to say, it now limited its application to the complaint concerning the failure to adopt the provisions necessary to implement the directive within the prescribed period .

7 . It merely remains for me conclude in those terms, in accordance with the previous decisions of the Court, that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty and I propose that the Court uphold the Commission' s action and order the defendant to pay the costs .

(*) Translated from the Portuguese .

( 1 ) Official Journal 1984, L 228, p . 25 .

( 2 ) Official Journal 1976, L 262, p . 139 .

( 3 ) Official Journal 1983, L 91, p . 29 .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia