I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
17.6.2024
(C/2024/3624)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Rigo Trading SA (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: H. Held, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark (Device of a wavy rectangular) – International registration designating the European Union No 1700702
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2024 in Case R 2150/2023-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and refer the case back to EUIPO;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 20 and Article 41(1) and (2)(a) and (c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), relating to the right to be heard and to the principles of good administration, legal certainty and equal treatment.