I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
30.10.2023
(Case T-557/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark granulat - International registration of the earlier figurative mark GRANULAT2000 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2023/330)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Arkadiusz Chmielarz (Olsztyn, Poland) (represented by: D. Sęczkowski, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Granulat GmbH (Troisdorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Hufendiek, lawyer)
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 June 2022 (Case R 1197/2021-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Arkadiusz Chmielarz to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by Granulat GmbH;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/330/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
(C/2023/330)
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15