EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-243/24: Action brought on 8 May 2024 – Ehrenreiter v EUIPO – Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft (PODOBEACH)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0243

62024TN0243

May 8, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3797

(Case T-243/24)

(C/2024/3797)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Johannes Ehrenreiter (Podersdorf, Austria) (represented by: S. Salomonowitz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. (Podersdorf am See, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark PODOBEACH – Application No 18 461 013

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2024 in Case R 790/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

amend the contested decision to the effect that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and the EU trade mark application is refused;

in the alternative, annul the contested decision and give a new decision, or remit the case to the Board of Appeal for re-examination;

in the event that the case is remitted to the Board of Appeal, rule that that Board of Appeal must issue a decision consistent with the legal interpretation given by the General Court;

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3797/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia