I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2024/3797)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Johannes Ehrenreiter (Podersdorf, Austria) (represented by: S. Salomonowitz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. (Podersdorf am See, Austria)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark PODOBEACH – Application No 18 461 013
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2024 in Case R 790/2023-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—amend the contested decision to the effect that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and the EU trade mark application is refused;
—in the alternative, annul the contested decision and give a new decision, or remit the case to the Board of Appeal for re-examination;
—in the event that the case is remitted to the Board of Appeal, rule that that Board of Appeal must issue a decision consistent with the legal interpretation given by the General Court;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3797/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—