- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-296/15: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil — Slovenia) — Medisanus d.o.o. v Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 2 and Article 23(2) and (8) — Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — Public contract for supplying a hospital — National legislation requiring that hospitals are to be supplied as a matter of priority with medicinal products obtained from national plasma — Principle of equal treatment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0296
62015CA0296
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.7.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 249/3
(Case C-296/15) (1)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Medicinal products for human use - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 2 and Article 23(2) and (8) - Articles 34 and 36 TFEU - Public contract for supplying a hospital - National legislation requiring that hospitals are to be supplied as a matter of priority with medicinal products obtained from national plasma - Principle of equal treatment))
(2017/C 249/03)
Language of the case: Slovenian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Medisanus d.o.o.
Defendant: Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2 and Article 23(2) and (8) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, and Article 34 TFEU read in conjunction with Article 36 TFEU, must be interpreted as precluding a clause in the tender specifications for a public contract which, in accordance with the law of the Member State to which the contracting authority belongs, requires medicinal products derived from plasma, which are the subject matter of the public procurement at issue, to be obtained from plasma collected in that Member State.
(1)
OJ C 346, 19.10.2015.