I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/2414)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Wireless Connect Ltd (Tipperary, Ireland) (represented by: S. Raes and F. Lancz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the Commission’s decision of 29 November 2024 SA. 55743 (2019/FC) ‘Ireland - Alleged infringement of State aid rules in relation to the National Broadband Plan Ireland’ (the Contested Decision);
—Order the defendant to pay all the costs and expenses of these proceedings, both its own legal costs and those of the applicant.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is not founded on one of the limited legal bases that the Commission is authorized to use when making a decision following a complaint, and the formal procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU should have been initiated given the existence of serious difficulties.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant wrongly decided that nothing in the complaint demonstrates that the aid under the National Broadband Plan scheme has not been lawfully granted and implemented and that no alterations have been made to the aid.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission has failed to state the reasons why the aid would have been lawfully granted and implemented.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/8499.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2414/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—