EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-39/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2023 — OA v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Retirement pension — Request relating to certain elements of pension rights — Rejection — Concept of ‘act adversely affecting an official’ — Equal treatment — Liability)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0039

62022TA0039

November 8, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/544

(Case T-39/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Retirement pension - Request relating to certain elements of pension rights - Rejection - Concept of ‘act adversely affecting an official’ - Equal treatment - Liability)

(C/2024/544)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: OA (represented by: G. Rossi and F. Regaldo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha and J. Van Pottelberge, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, in essence, the annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 19 April 2021 by which it rejected the request which he had submitted under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and which related to certain elements of his pension rights and the annulment of the decision of 20 October 2021 in so far as it partially rejected his complaint and, second, compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of the European Parliament’s alleged breach of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/544/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia