I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-517/08 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Directive 91/414/EEC - Non-inclusion of endosulfan in Annex I to that directive - Withdrawal of marketing authorisations - Appeal manifestly unfounded)
2010/C 234/24
Language of the case: English
Appellants: Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Alfa Agricultural Supplies SA, Aragonesas Agro, SA (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, avocats)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Bayer CropScience AG, European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) (represented by: L. Parpala and N.B. Rasmussen, acting as Agents, C. Mereu, avocat, K. Van Maldegem, avocat, D. Waelbroeck, avocat and N. Rampal, avocate), Kingdom of Spain
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2008 in Case T-75/06 Bayer CropScience AG and Others v Commission by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 864 of 2 December 2005 concerning the non-inclusion of endosulfan in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that active substance [notified under No C(2005) 4611] (OJ 2005 L 317, p. 25)
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Alfa Agricultural Supplies SA and Aragonesas Agro SA are ordered to pay the costs.
3.European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.