- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-82/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece)) — Dimos Agiou Nikolaou Kritis v Ipourgos Agrotikis Anaptixis kai Trofimon (Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 — Monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the European Union — Definitions — Terms ‘forest’ and ‘other wooded land’ — Field of application)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CA0082
62009CA0082
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.6.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 161/11
(Case C-82/09) (*)
(Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 - Monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the European Union - Definitions - Terms ‘forest’ and ‘other wooded land’ - Field of application)
(2010/C 161/15)
Language of the case: Greek
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Dimos Agiou Nikolaou Kritis
Defendant: Ipourgos Agrotikis Anaptixis kai Trofimon
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Simvoulio tis Epikratias — Interpretation of Article 3(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community (Forest Focus) (OJ 2003 L 324, p. 1) — Definitions of ‘forest’ and ‘other wooded land’ — Divergent definitions
Operative part of the judgment
Article 3(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community (Forest Focus), which define, for the purposes of that regulation, the terms ‘forest’ and ‘wooded land’, must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions which contain different definitions of those terms as regards actions which are not governed by the regulation.
(*) Language of the case: Greek.