EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-485/24: Action brought on 19 September 2024 – Pech v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0485

62024TN0485

September 19, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/6449

(Case T-485/24)

(C/2024/6449)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Laurent Pech (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Zatschler, Senior Counsel, M. Delargy and A. Bateman, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the implied decision of the European Commission of 6 September 2024, by which the Commission, pursuant to Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) is deemed to have rejected the applicant’s request for access to a number of documents mentioned in the Commission’s press release IP/24/2461 dated 6 May 2024, announcing its intention to close the Article 7(1) TEU procedure for Poland;

order the Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.

Single plea in law, alleging failure to comply with the duty to state reasons provided for by Article 296 TFEU.

The Commission failed to reply within the applicable deadline to the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to documents, giving rise to a deemed refusal pursuant to Article 8(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001. Such a deemed refusal of access entails, by definition, an absolute lack of reasoning and therefore does not satisfy the duty to state reasons which Article 296 TFEU imposes on EU institutions.

*

Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6449/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia