- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-677/22, Przedsiębiorstwo A. (Period for payment of 120 days set by the debtor): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Katowice – Wschód w Katowicach – Poland) – Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno – Handlowo – Usługowe A. v P. S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Commercial transactions between undertakings – Article 3(5) – Obligation on Member States to ensure that the period for payment set in the contract concluded between undertakings does not exceed 60 calendar days – Possibility, for contracting parties, to set a longer period for payment – Condition for the express agreement in the contract of such a period – Condition that a contractual term is not grossly unfair to the creditor – Cumulative conditions – Contracts in which the terms are determined unilaterally by one of the parties – Contractual term by which the debtor unilaterally sets the period for payment of 120 days – Unlawfulness)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0677
62022CA0677
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/1732
31.3.2025
(Case C-677/22,
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Combating late payment in commercial transactions - Directive 2011/7/EU - Commercial transactions between undertakings - Article 3(5) - Obligation on Member States to ensure that the period for payment set in the contract concluded between undertakings does not exceed 60 calendar days - Possibility, for contracting parties, to set a longer period for payment - Condition for the express agreement in the contract of such a period - Condition that a contractual term is not grossly unfair to the creditor - Cumulative conditions - Contracts in which the terms are determined unilaterally by one of the parties - Contractual term by which the debtor unilaterally sets the period for payment of 120 days - Unlawfulness)
(C/2025/1732)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno – Handlowo – Usługowe A.
Defendant: P. S.A.
Operative part of the judgment
Article 3(5) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions
must be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘otherwise expressly agreed in the contract’ precludes a contractual term setting a period for payment longer than 60 calendar days from being determined unilaterally by the debtor, unless it can be established, having regard to all the contractual documents and terms contained in that contract, that the parties to that contract have expressed their concurrence of wills to be bound specifically by the term concerned.
—
(1) OJ C 35, 30.1.2023.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1732/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—