- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-202/16: Action brought on 3 May 2016 — Keturi kambariai v EUIPO — Coffee In (coffee inn)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0202
62016TN0202
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 270/46
(Case T-202/16)
(2016/C 270/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: UAB Keturi kambariai (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: R. Pumputienė, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: AS Coffee In (Tallinn, Estonia)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark with the colour claim ‘black, orange, white’ containing the word elements ‘coffee inn’ — Application for registration No 11 475 233
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2016 in Case R 137/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and, consequently, reject the opposition and authorise the registration of the mark applied for;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs relating to the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.