EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-489/24, Safita: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 11 July 2024 – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, X

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0489

62024CN0489

July 11, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/5789

7.10.2024

(Case C-489/24, Safita)

(C/2024/5789)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, X

Questions referred

1.May the determining authority apply point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) of the Asylum Procedures Directive repeatedly and consecutively?

2.If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:

a.Under what conditions may the determining authority apply point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) of the Asylum Procedures Directive repeatedly and consecutively, and is the total duration of the period over which the determining authority may apply that provision repeatedly and consecutively subject to any restrictions?

b.In answering the question whether the determining authority was permitted to extend the time limit for making its decision following, and consecutive to, a previous decree extending that time limit, to what extent can or must the court take account of the increase in the number of asylum applications, including relative to the period preceding the previous decree extending the time limit, and the determining authority’s efforts (if any) to improve the shortfall in its decision-making capacity in order to ensure – against the backdrop of Article 4(1) of the Asylum Procedures Directive – an adequate and complete examination of asylum applications?

The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5789/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia