- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-566/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel (Luxembourg) lodged on 25 July 2019 — Parquet général du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg v JR
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0566
62019CN0566
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.10.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 337/8
(Case C-566/19)
(2019/C 337/09)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Parquet général du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg
Defendant: JR
Questions referred
Can the French Public Prosecutor’s Office at the investigating court or trial court, which has jurisdiction in France, under the law of that State, to issue a European arrest warrant, be considered to be an issuing judicial authority, within the autonomous meaning of that term in Article 6(1) of Council Framework Decision No 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002, (1) in circumstances where, deemed to monitor compliance with the conditions necessary for the issue of a European arrest warrant and to examine whether such a warrant is proportionate in relation to the details of the criminal file, it is, at the same time, the authority responsible for the criminal prosecution in the same case?
(1) Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).