- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-624/16 TO: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — L’Huillier v Gollnisch and Parliament (Third-party proceedings — Rejection of the third-party applicant’s application to intervene — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0624(01)
62016TB0624(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.3.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 103/43
(Case T-624/16 TO) (*)
((Third-party proceedings - Rejection of the third-party applicant’s application to intervene - Inadmissibility))
(2019/C 103/58)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Third-party applicant: Guillaume L’Huillier (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: A. Varaut, lawyer)
Applicant in the main proceedings: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)
Defendant in the main proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and L. Vétillard, acting as Agents)
Re:
Third-party application against the judgment of 7 March 2018, Gollnisch v Parliament (T-624/16, not published, under appeal, EU:T:2018:121).
Operative part of the order
1.The third-party application is dismissed.
2.Mr Guillaume L’Huillier shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.
3.Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.