EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-92/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Darment v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 — Fluorinated greenhouse gases — Electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market — Decision to register — Authorisation to use a quota — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Principle of sound administration)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0092

62021TA0092

June 8, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/27

(Case T-92/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Environment - Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 - Fluorinated greenhouse gases - Electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market - Decision to register - Authorisation to use a quota - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Principle of sound administration)

(2022/C 294/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Darment Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: C. Ginter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Sanfrutos Cano, K. Talabér-Ritz and B. De Meester, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Darment Oy, seeks the annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 15 December 2020 to enter its quota for the year 2021 and for the years 2019 and 2020 in the electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) on the market (‘the HFC registry’) (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Darment Oy to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia