I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-414/15 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - State aid - Existing aid - Article 108(1) TFEU - Aid schemes in favour of social housing corporations - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Articles 17, 18 and 19 - Assessment by the Commission of the compatibility with the internal market of an existing aid scheme - Proposal of appropriate measures - Commitments given by the national authorities in order to comply with EU law - Compatibility decision - Scope of judicial review - Legal effects))
(2017/C 151/08)
Language of the case: Dutch
Appellants: Stichting Woonlinie, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting Woonstede (represented by: L. Hancher, E. Besselink and P. Glazener, advocaten)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Belgium, Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, advocaat)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 12 May 2015, Stichting Woonlinie and Others v Commission (T-202/10 RENV, not published, EU:T:2015:287);
2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Reserves the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017151EN.01000602-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017151EN.01000602-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.