- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-272/17: Action brought on 5 May 2017 — Webgarden v EUIPO (Dating Bracelet)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0272
62017TN0272
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 231/35
(Case T-272/17)
(2017/C 231/43)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: Webgarden Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: G. Jambrik, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Design at issue: European Union design ‘Dating Bracelet’ — Application for registration No 14450019
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 March 2017 in Case R 658/2016-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 4 of Regulation No 207/2009.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.
—Infringement of Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
—Infringement of Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.