- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-207/17: Action brought on 5 April 2017 — Senetic v EUIPO — HP Hewlett Packard Group (hp)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0207
62017TN0207
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.5.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 168/31
(Case T-207/17)
(2017/C 168/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Senetic S.A. (Katowice, Poland) (represented by: M. Krekora, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: HP Hewlett Packard Group LLC (Houston, Texas, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the letters ‘hp’ — EU trade mark No 8 579 021
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 February 2017 in Case R 1001/2016-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the intervener to pay the costs of proceedings before the Court, as well as the EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.