- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-223/23, Redu: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov — Romania) — criminal proceedings against L.D. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply to questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation — Lack of sufficient details — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CB0223
62023CB0223
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/1666
(Case C-223/23, (*) Redu)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply to questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient details - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/1666)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Party to the main criminal proceedings
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Brașov (Court of Appeal of Brașov, Romania), made by decision of 11 April 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1666/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
*
Language of the case: Romanian
* * *