I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(C/2024/6111)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: V-Label GmbH (Winterthur, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Seelig and D. Bischof, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vriendly e.V. (Hürth, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark VRIENDLY.ORG V VEGAN – EU trade mark No 18 203 542
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 June 2024 in Case R 2348/2023-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare EU trade mark No 18 203 542 ‘VRIENDLY.ORG V VEGAN’ invalid in its entirety;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the costs of the cancellation and appeal proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) and (2)(a)(iv), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and failure to state reasons in breach of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 8(5), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6111/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—