EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-588/23, Scai: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania (Italy) lodged on 25 September 2023 — Scai Srl v Regione Campania

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0588

62023CN0588

September 25, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/1293

11.12.2023

(Case C-588/23, Scai)

(C/2023/1293)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Scai Srl

Respondent: Regione Campania

Questions referred

1.Do Articles 108 and 288 TFEU and Articles 16 and 31 of [Regulation (EU) No 2015/1589] (1) preclude national legislation, such as Article 48 of Law No 234 of 24 December 2012, which allows the national authority, during the implementation stage of recovery, to broaden the circle of persons required to repay the unlawful aid, by means of an assessment concerning economic continuity between undertakings, without excluding that power where the Commission has already identified the direct beneficiaries, thereby excluding the Commission’s competence in relation to State aid?

2.Do Articles 263 and 288 TFEU, Articles 41 and 47 of the [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union] and Articles 16 and 31 of [Regulation (EU) No 2015/1589] preclude national legislation, such as Article 48 of Law No 234 of 24 December 2012 on State aid, in so far as — in providing that the State, when implementing a recovery decision, is to identify, where necessary, the persons required to repay the aid — it also permits the decision to be implemented with regard to a person other than the addressees of the decision who is autonomous, did not participate in the procedure before the Commission, did not have the right to be heard and, consequently, does not have legal standing to contest that decision before the General Court of the European Union?

Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (codification) (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1293/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia