I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
19.8.2024
(Case C-70/23 P)
(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for prestressing steel - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) - Judgment annulling the decision in part and fixing a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine initially imposed - Application of payments made on a provisional basis - Decision of the European Commission on the outstanding balance of the fine - Due date for payment of a fine, the amount of which has been fixed by the EU judicature, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction)
(C/2024/4934)
Language of the case: German
Appellants: Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: O. Duys and N. Tkatchenko, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Keidel, L. Mantl and P. Rossi, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4934/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
*1 Language of the case: German.