I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 284/69)
Language of the case: Swedish
Applicant: Scania CV AB (Södertälje, Sweden) (represented by: C. Langenius, P. Sundin and S. Falkner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark V8 — Application No 18 120 085
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2022 in Case R 1868/2020-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision pursuant to Article 72 of the EU Trade Mark Regulation and, by amending EUIPO’s decision, approve Scania’s application for registration of the figurative mark for all the goods and services for which EUIPO rejected the application;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.