- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-69/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 17 October 2013 — BF v Court of Auditors (Civil service — Procedure for filling the post of director — Report of the pre-selection board — Statement of reasons — None — Unlawfulness of the nomination decision — Conditions)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FA0069
62011FA0069
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.11.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 352/23
(Case F-69/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Civil service - Procedure for filling the post of director - Report of the pre-selection board - Statement of reasons - None - Unlawfulness of the nomination decision - Conditions)
2013/C 352/42
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: BF (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy and J. Vermer, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck)
Re:
Application to annul the decision of the Court of Auditors not to appoint the applicant to the post of director of the Directorate of Human Resources and to appoint another candidate to that post.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decisions of 18 November 2011 by which the Court of Auditors of the European Union appointed Ms Z to the post of Director of Human Resources and rejected BF’s candidacy for that post;
2.Considers that there is no need to adjudicate on the request of the Court of Auditors of the European Union to remove from the file Annexes A7 and A11 to the application;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Orders the Court of Auditors of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by BF.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011, p. 52.