- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-509/19: Action brought on 16 July 2019 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0509
62019TN0509
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 295/86
(Case T-509/19)
(2019/C 295/112)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Asolo LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: W. Pors, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark FLÜGEL — European Union trade mark No 637 686
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 May 2019 in Case R 201/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity;
—order EUIPO and Red Bull to pay the costs of these proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.