EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-487/19: Action brought on 8 July 2019 — CU v Committee of the Regions

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0487

62019TN0487

July 8, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/81

(Case T-487/19)

(2019/C 295/107)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CU (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the 18 October 2018 reducing the multiplication factor applicable to the calculation of the applicant’s remuneration following his promotion to grade AD 14 during the 2018 promotion exercise;

order the Committee of the Regions to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 44 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), read in conjunction with Article 7(7) of Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations, in so far as the contested decision infringes the applicant’s acquired right to an increase in the multiplication factor applicable to the calculation of his remuneration corresponding to the value of the automatic step advancement.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement, by the contested decision, of the fundamental right to equal treatment and the principle of proportionality in so far as two officials of equivalent merit and seniority who are promoted on the same day are treated differently.

3.Third plea in law, alleging breach of the applicant’s legitimate expectation that the value of his automatically acquired step advancement will be maintained following his subsequent promotion, on the ground that the multiplication factor was reduced ten months after the initial act.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia