EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-496/24, Stichting de Thuiskopie: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 17 July 2024 – Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding, Stichting de Thuiskopie v HP Nederland B.V., Dell B.V., Stichting Overlegorgaan Blanco Informatiedragers

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0496

62024CN0496

July 17, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6242

28.10.2024

(Case C-496/24, Stichting de Thuiskopie)

(C/2024/6242)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding, Stichting de Thuiskopie

Respondents: HP Nederland B.V., Dell B.V., Stichting Overlegorgaan Blanco Informatiedragers

Questions referred

1.Can a reproduction with the characteristics described above in paragraph 2.3, (i)-(iii) (offline streaming copy), having regard also to the three-step test (Article 5(5) of the Copyright Directive), be regarded as a ‘reproduction … made by a natural person for private use, and for ends that are neither directly or indirectly commercial’ as referred to in Article 5(2)(b) of the Copyright Directive?

2.Do the objectives of the Copyright Directive, including a high level of copyright protection, a fair balance between the interests of the rightholder and the interests of the user, and a coherent and technologically neutral application by the Member States of the exceptions and limitations, preclude a national regulation under which the private copying exception does not also include offline streaming copies?

3.Is it relevant to the answer to one or more of the preceding questions whether the rightholders receive compensation per offline streaming copy made, or whether they receive compensation based on the number of times an offline streaming copy is played by the user of the streaming service?

Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6242/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia