- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-231/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Akgün Seramik and Others v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Definition of Union industry – Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Causal link – Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Single economic entity – Manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0231
62023TA0231
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/3890
21.7.2025
(Case T-231/23)
(Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Definition of Union industry - Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Sampling - Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Injury to the Union industry - Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Causal link - Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Export price - Adjustment - Functions comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis - Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Single economic entity - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2025/3890)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Akgün Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Pazaryeri, Türkiye) and the fourteen other applicants whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: F. Di Gianni, A. Scalini and G. Coppo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, R. Pethke and J. Zieliński, acting as Agents)
Re:
By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/265 of 9 February 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye (OJ 2023 L 41, p. 1), in so far as it concerns them.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Akgün Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C 223, 26.6.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3890/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—