I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-284/17)(Action for annulment and compensation - Institutional law - Member of the European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Decision to withdraw parliamentary immunity - No longer any locus standi - No need, in part, to adjudicate - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
(2018/C 052/43)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Marion Anne Perrine Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, France) (represented initially by: M. Ceccaldi, and subsequently by: R. Bosselut, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Dean and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)
Firstly, application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision P8_TA(2017)0056 of the Parliament of 2 March 2017 to withdraw the applicant’s parliamentary immunity and, secondly, application on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of Decision P8_TA(2017)0056 of the Parliament of 2 March 2017 to withdraw the parliamentary immunity of Ms Marion Anne Perrine Le Pen.
2.The remainder of the action is dismissed.
3.Ms Le Pen shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Parliament.
Language of the case: French.
* * *
(1) OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.