I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 373/20)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: OLX BV (Hoofddorp, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Lodge, K. Gilbert, Solicitors and V. Jones, Barrister)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Stra Lda (Coimbra, Portugal)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark STRADIA — Application for registration No 14 841 985
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 in joined Cases R 2228/2017-4 and R 2229/2017-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—in the alternative, alter the contested decision to state that the Opposition should be remitted to the Opposition Division for it to reconsider the Opposition;
—order EUIPO to pay the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this Application and the costs before the Board. In the alternative, if the other party before the Board intervenes, then EUIPO and the intervener jointly and severally pay the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this Application and the costs before the Board.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.