I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Safeguard measures - Market for steel products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/159 - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Standing to bring proceedings - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Legitimate expectations - Principle of sound administration - Duty of care - Threat of serious injury - Manifest error of assessment - Initiation of a safeguard investigation - Competence of the Commission - Rights of the defence)
(2022/C 284/26)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Uzina Metalurgica Moldoveneasca OAO (Rîbniţa, Moldova) (represented by: P. Vander Schueren and E. Gergondet, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Uzina Metalurgica Moldoveneasca OAO, seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/159 of 31 January 2019 imposing definitive safeguard measures against imports of certain steel products (OJ 2019 L 31, p. 27), in so far as it applies to the applicant.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Uzina Metalurgica Moldoveneasca OAO is ordered to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.