EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-323/10: Action brought on 3 August 2010 — Chabou v OHIM — Chalou Kleiderfabrik (CHABOU)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0323

62010TN0323

August 3, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/42

(Case T-323/10)

()

(2010/C 288/81)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Chickmouza Chabou (Rheine, Germany) (represented by: K.-J. Triebold, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Chalou Kleiderfabrik GmbH (Herschweiler-Pettersheim, Germany)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 May 2010 in Case R 1165/2009-1 or amend that decision and reject the opposition

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark CHABOU for goods in class 25.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Chalou Kleiderfabrik GmbH.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark Chalou, registered as a national and international trade mark for goods in class 25.

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed.

Pleas in law: The contested decision fails to take account of the special circumstances of the present case and, instead, applies the established principles concerning the issues of the similarity of signs and of protected goods and services in the light of the likelihood of confusion in a purely formulaic and mechanical fashion, without sufficient regard to the specific aspects of the case and the requisite global assessment of all the circumstances.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia