EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-478/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 September 2023 — China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission and Others (Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/140 — Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in the People’s Republic of China and in India — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings — Representative association of exporters — Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Article 3(2), (3), (6) and (7) — Injury — Calculation of the import volume — Positive evidence — Objective examination — Extrapolation — Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production — Prices charged intra-group — Causal link — Assessment of injury by segment — None — Article 6(7) — Article 20(2) and (4) — Procedural rights)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0478

62021CA0478

September 21, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/621

13.11.2023

(Case C-478/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/140 - Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in the People’s Republic of China and in India - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Standing to bring proceedings - Representative association of exporters - Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Article 3(2), (3), (6) and (7) - Injury - Calculation of the import volume - Positive evidence - Objective examination - Extrapolation - Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production - Prices charged intra-group - Causal link - Assessment of injury by segment - None - Article 6(7) - Article 20(2) and (4) - Procedural rights)

(C/2023/621)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products, Cangzhou Qinghong Foundry Co. Ltd, Botou City Qinghong Foundry Co. Ltd, Lingshou County Boyuan Foundry Co. Ltd, Handan Qunshan Foundry Co. Ltd, Heping Cast Co. Ltd Yi County, Hong Guang Handan Cast Foundry Co. Ltd, Shanxi Yuansheng Casting and Forging Industrial Co. Ltd, Botou City Wangwu Town Tianlong Casting Factory, Tangxian Hongyue Machinery Accessory Foundry Co. Ltd (represented by: R. Antonini, avvocato, B. Maniatis and E. Monard, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by T. Maxian Rusche and P. Němečková, subsequently by K. Blanck, P. Němečková and T. Maxian Rusche, and finally by T. Maxian Rusche et P. Němečková, Agents), EJ Picardie, Fondatel Lecomte, Fonderies Dechaumont, Fundiciones de Odena, SA, Heinrich Meier Eisengießerei GmbH & Co. KG, Saint-Gobain Construction Products UK Ltd, Saint-Gobain PAM Canalisation, formerly Saint-Gobain PAM, Ulefos Oy (represented initially by M. Hommé and B. O’Connor, avocats, subsequently by M. Hommé, B. O’Connor, avocats, et U. O’Dwyer, solicitor)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products, Cangzhou Qinghong Foundry Co. Ltd, Botou City Qinghong Foundry Co. Ltd, Lingshou County Boyuan Foundry Co. Ltd, Handan Qunshan Foundry Co. Ltd, Heping Cast Co. Ltd Yi County, Hong Guang Handan Cast Foundry Co. Ltd, Shanxi Yuansheng Casting and Forging Industrial Co. Ltd, Botou City Wangwu Town Tianlong Casting Factory and Tangxian Hongyue Machinery Accessory Foundry Co. Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, EJ Picardie, Fondatel Lecomte, Fonderies Dechaumont, Fundiciones de Ódena SA, Heinrich Meier Eisengießerei GmbH & Co. KG, Saint-Gobain Construction Products UK Ltd, Saint-Gobain PAM Canalisation and Ulefos Oy.

* Language of the case: English.

(1) OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/621/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia