EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-869/24, Europolice: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 16 December 2024 – Europolice s.r.l. v Consip SpA, Ministero della Giustizia

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0869

62024CN0869

December 16, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/1874

7.4.2025

(Case C-869/24, Europolice)

(C/2025/1874)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: Europolice s.r.l.

Defendants and respondents: Consip SpA, Ministero della Giustizia

Questions referred

Must EU law, and in particular Article 2(1)(10) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 (on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC), (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) which defines ‘economic operator’, in relation to recitals 1 and 2 of that directive, be interpreted broadly to include the corporate group of which such an operator forms part?;

Can EU law, and in particular Article 46 of Directive 2014/24/EU relating to the division of contracts into lots, which empowers contracting authorities to divide the contract into separate lots (paragraph 1), to limit the submission of tenders ‘for one, for several or for all of the lots’ (paragraph 2), and to indicate ‘the number of lots that may be awarded to one tenderer’ (paragraph 2, [second] subparagraph), be applied by giving prominence to the corporate group to which the tenderer belongs?;

Does EU law, and in particular the general principles of certainty and proportionality, preclude the automatic exclusion from the tender procedure of a tenderer belonging to a group of companies that, in a tender procedure divided into lots, has participated and submitted tenders through its subsidiaries in excess of the participation and contract award limits laid down in the contract notice?

(1)

OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1874/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia