- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-247/23: Order of the General Court of 30 January 2025 – Maud Tea & Seed v Commission (Action for annulment – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Lawfulness of the authority to act given to the applicant’s lawyers – No direct concern – Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0247
62023TB0247
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2396
28.4.2025
(Case T-247/23)
(Action for annulment - Plant protection products - Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam - Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products - Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 - Lawfulness of the authority to act given to the applicant’s lawyers - No direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/2396)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd (Kolkata, India) (represented by: D. Waelbroeck and I. Antypas, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, J. Norris and M. ter Haar, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, primarily, of Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/334 of 2 February 2023 amending Annexes II and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for clothianidin and thiamethoxam in or on certain products (OJ 2023 L 47, p. 29, corrigendum OJ 2023 L 96, p. 89) in its entirety or, in the alternative, of the contested regulation as regards those limits applicable to teas.
Operative part of the order
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union, the European Parliament, the French Republic, the American Farm Bureau Federation, the Canada Grains Council, the International Fresh Produce Association, the Minor Crop Farmer Alliance, the National Cotton Council of America, the U.S. Grains Council, the USA Rice Federation and CropLife International.
Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of the Commission’s costs relating to the applications to intervene.
Maud Tea & Seed, the Commission, the Council, the European Parliament, the French Republic, the American Farm Bureau Federation, the Canada Grains Council, the International Fresh Produce Association, the Minor Crop Farmer Alliance, the National Cotton Council of America, the U.S. Grains Council, the USA Rice Federation and CropLife International shall bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.
—
(1)
OJ C 286, 14.8.2023
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2396/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—