I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-373/20) (*)
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Community design representing a transportable building - Earlier designs - Proof of disclosure - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - No different overall impression - Article 6(1)(b) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons)
(2021/C 329/36)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Framery Oy (Tampere, Finland) (represented by: A. Renck and C. Stöber, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Smartblock Oy (Helsinki, Finland)
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2020 (Case R 616/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Smartblock and Framery.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Framery Oy to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
* * *
(1) OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.